INNOVATION APPROACH IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES IN RESPONDING TO VOLATILITY-LITERATURE REVIEW STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v7i1.781Keywords:
Innovation, Approaches, Supporting Components, Countries In The World, Literature Study, Organizational SurvivalAbstract
Innovation is one of the keys to the success of an organization. This literature review study aims to explore the supporting components of innovation and how the innovation approach is applied in various countries in the world. This study uses a literature review as a literature search material that has a large repository for academic studies, particularly in Elsevier (Scopus). The search for references was carried out by applying the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria methods. Main search terms via search engines: (Innovative Work Behavior) and (Countries) and (Companies) and (Support) or (Impede), with searches from 2018 to 2020. This study uses a literary approach, with final results 12 The literature shows that there are at least 12 important components in an organization both internally and externally that are discussed in this research literature, including: management control systems, technology licenses, R&D, company size, sectoral characteristics and access to finance, company resources and dynamic external environmental capabilities, number of executives with financial background, company age, company size, forward-looking search, service ecosystem. Through this literature study, business agencies should pay attention to these variables in developing innovations that are an important part of organizational survival. Future studies need to add a longer time span with a wider database.
References
Abubakar, Y. A., Hand, C., Smallbone, D., & Saridakis, G. (2019). What specific modes of internationalization influence SME innovation in Sub-Saharan least developed countries (LDCs)? Technovation, 79(May), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.004
Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. N., & Lane, D. A. (2015). Process and emergence in the economy. Complexity and the Economy, 89–102.
Audenaert, M., Vanderstraeten, A., & Buyens, D. (2017). When innovation requirements empower individual innovation: The role of job complexity. Personnel Review, 46(3), 608–623.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664.
Best, S., & Eftimov, L. (2019). Enterprise, entrepreneurship, and innovation: what this means for the new HRM professional and the new workplace. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal.
Bogliacino, F., Codagnone, C., Veltri, G. A., Chakravarti, A., Ortoleva, P., Gaskell, G., Ivchenko, A., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Mureddu, F., & Rudisill, C. (2015). Pathos & Ethos: emotions and willingness to pay for tobacco products. PLoS One, 10(10), e0139542.
Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2013). Profits, R&D, and innovation—a model and a test. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 649–678.
Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., & Spence, M. (2014). New world order: labor, capital, and ideas in the power law economy. Foreign Affairs, 93(4), 44–53.
Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. (2017). Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 1045–1064.
Camelo?Ordaz, C., Hernández?Lara, A. B., & Valle?Cabrera, R. (2005). The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 683–705.
Carolina, ?. (2021). THE DETERMINANTS OF INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS. Studies in Business & Economics, 16(3), 247–265.
Chang, Y.-C., Chang, H.-T., Chi, H.-R., Chen, M.-H., & Deng, L.-L. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view. Technovation, 32(7–8), 441–451.
Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, 32(6), 329–344.
Colovic, A., & Williams, C. (2020). Group culture, gender diversity and organizational innovativeness: Evidence from Serbia. Journal of Business Research, 110, 282–291.
Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.
Crespi, G., & Peirano, F. (2007). Measuring innovation in Latin America: what we did, where we are and what we want to do. Paper for the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries UNU-MERIT.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi?dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
Daft, R., & Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284.
Data, I. I. (2005). Oslo manual. Paris and Luxembourg: OECD/Euro-Stat.
Derbyshire, J. (2014). The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors. Technovation, 34(10), 574–581.
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science, 366(6471), eaax3100.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Dziallas, M. (2020). How to evaluate innovative ideas and concepts at the front-end?: A front-end perspective of the automotive innovation process. Journal of Business Research, 110, 502–518.
Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80, 3–29.
Enderwick, P., & Buckley, P. J. (2019). Beyond supply and assembly relations: Collaborative innovation in global factory systems. Journal of Business Research, 103, 547–556.
Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 381–410.
Galiulina, A., & Touate, S. (2022). The Role of Culture in Managing Open Innovation Projects within Regional Clusters.
Geldes, C., & Felzensztein, C. (2013). Marketing innovations in the agribusiness sector. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 26(1), 108–138.
Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2017). Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industries: The case of an emerging economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 55–66.
Gölgeci, I., Ferraris, A., Arslan, A., & Tarba, S. Y. (2019). European MNE subsidiaries’ embeddedness and innovation performance: Moderating role of external search depth and breadth. Journal of Business Research, 102(May), 97–108.
Gölgeci, I., & Kuivalainen, O. (2020). Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? The role of absorptive capacity and marketing-supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 63–74.
Hart, S., Jan Hultink, E., Tzokas, N., & Commandeur, H. R. (2003). Industrial companies’ evaluation criteria in new product development gates. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(1), 22–36.
Jissink, T., Schweitzer, F., & Rohrbeck, R. (2019a). Forward-looking search during innovation projects: Under which conditions it impacts innovativeness. Technovation, 84, 71–85.
Jissink, T., Schweitzer, F., & Rohrbeck, R. (2019b). Forward-looking search during innovation projects: Under which conditions it impacts innovativeness. Technovation, 84–85(June 2018), 71–85.
Ketelhöhn, N., & Ogliastri, E. (2013). Introduction: innovation in Latin America. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 26(1), 12–32.
Kirilov, R., & Kazakova, M. (2022). Human Capital As A Factor For Successful Digitalisation Of Local Administrative Services. Business Management, 2(2), 48-58.
Liang, G. (2016). The “Fox–Apple” Partnership in the Global Value Chain: How Did Foreign Direct Investment and Contract Manufacturing Reshape the Landscape of the Electronics Industry? In Uncovering value added in trade: New approaches to analyzing global value chains (pp. 141–166). World Scientific.
Liu, B., Zhou, W., Chan, K. C., & Chen, Y. (2020a). Corporate executives with financial backgrounds: The crowding-out effect on innovation investment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 109(March 2019), 161–173. Liu, B., Zhou, W., Chan, K. C., & Chen, Y. (2020b). Corporate executives with financial backgrounds: The crowding-out effect on innovation investment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 109, 161–173.
Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51(2), 164–179.
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.
Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Ardito, L., & Savino, T. (2018). Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size. Journal of Business Research, 86(February), 190–201. Milesi, D., Petelski, N., & Verre, V. (2013). Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata. Technovation, 33(2–3), 78–87.
Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 61–74.
Ngo, L. V., Bucic, T., Sinha, A., & Lu, V. N. (2019). Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 94, 154–161.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.
Obwegeser, N., & Müller, S. D. (2018a). Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications. Technovation, 74, 1–17.
Obwegeser, N., & Müller, S. D. (2018b). Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications. Technovation, 74–75(January), 1–17. Parnell, R. J. (2002). Group size and structure in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Mbeli Bai, Republic of Congo. American Journal of Primatology: Official Journal of the American Society of Primatologists, 56(4), 193–206.
Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81.
Pérez, J. A. H., Kunc, M. H., Durst, S., Flores, A., & Geldes, C. (2018). Impact of competition from unregistered firms on R&D investment by industrial sectors in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 179–189.
Petruzzelli, A. M., Ardito, L., & Savino, T. (2018). Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size. Journal of Business Research, 86, 190–201.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social ?dentity theory of ?ntergroup behavior”. Psychology of Intergroup Relations,(7-24), Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Wieland, H. (2020). Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 116(December 2018), 526–534.
Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315.
